1 thought on “If domestic mobile phones abandon Qualcomm and use domestic chips, what will it affect the mobile phone?”
Ruben
If domestic mobile phones abandon Qualcomm and use domestic chips, the operation performance of its mobile phone system will be worse than before, because as of the current adaptation of the Qualcomm Snapdragon processor to the Android system, there are still many Android systems in the world. Brand machines are also using Qualcomm Snapdragon processors. In addition to reducing the performance of the Android system, the United States will also from the root cause of the optical carciers to the output of domestic chips, because the domestic 7nm EUV lithography machine has not seen news about technological breakthroughs. And information related to the production of domestic 7nm SOC chips. It’s encounter in Huawei’s new products in 2021, the mobile phone business is indeed difficult, because the United States is now very strict in the management and control of the semiconductor industry in the chip field. Blind. Huawei wants to use the new Hisilicon Kirin chip, and the United States has begun to limit it through the core technology patent in the lithography machine. The is not only Huawei, but also Taiwan TSMC, China, which can produce Hisilicon Kirin chips. It is not only forced to move to the United States. risk. For Hisilicon Kirin processor, for Hisilicon Semiconductor, they are mainly responsible for the integrated design of electronic products such as mobile phones and computers. The design of the chip needs to be designed, simulated and tested through professional EDA tools. Most of these advanced EDA tools come from abroad. The United States now has strict authorization and control of its licenses. We can only choose to replace the EDA tools with poor domestic self -developed functions. Hisilicon Kirin processor, always using the ARM V8 architecture. Although this version of the architecture is permanently used by ARM, it is also limited to the instruction set of its architecture. The GPU and other units in the architecture are constantly changing changes Essence , some chip research and development companies in the United States are also constantly spending huge sums of money to buy new chips developed by ARM companies, so that other chip design manufacturers have to break through the original chip architecture. Liveted mobile phones to fully replace Qualcomm Snapdragon processors with domestic chips, the cost is very huge at present. The main reason is that there are many technical links in the chip field. It is controlled by relevant foreign institutions such as the United States. From all aspects of choosing the structure of the chip, the tools for designing the chip, and the supply chain of the foundry chip It is very difficult to use domestic mobile phones. The current situation of Huawei Hisilicon Kirin and the previous encounters of Xiaomi Surging S1 are enough to explain the dilemma facing domestic chips. Even if domestic chips can mass production and assemble them on domestic mobile phones, will mobile users choose to use it. The performance will be worse, the fever will be higher, and the energy consumption will be higher, but these do not matter to me. I am in the principle of enough use. If all mobile phones are abandoned, domestic mobile phones will rapidly develop breakthrough bottlenecks. Domestic hand -made opportunities will invest in R
If domestic mobile phones abandon Qualcomm and use domestic chips, the operation performance of its mobile phone system will be worse than before, because as of the current adaptation of the Qualcomm Snapdragon processor to the Android system, there are still many Android systems in the world. Brand machines are also using Qualcomm Snapdragon processors.
In addition to reducing the performance of the Android system, the United States will also from the root cause of the optical carciers to the output of domestic chips, because the domestic 7nm EUV lithography machine has not seen news about technological breakthroughs. And information related to the production of domestic 7nm SOC chips.
It’s encounter in Huawei’s new products in 2021, the mobile phone business is indeed difficult, because the United States is now very strict in the management and control of the semiconductor industry in the chip field. Blind.
Huawei wants to use the new Hisilicon Kirin chip, and the United States has begun to limit it through the core technology patent in the lithography machine.
The is not only Huawei, but also Taiwan TSMC, China, which can produce Hisilicon Kirin chips. It is not only forced to move to the United States. risk.
For Hisilicon Kirin processor, for Hisilicon Semiconductor, they are mainly responsible for the integrated design of electronic products such as mobile phones and computers.
The design of the chip needs to be designed, simulated and tested through professional EDA tools. Most of these advanced EDA tools come from abroad. The United States now has strict authorization and control of its licenses. We can only choose to replace the EDA tools with poor domestic self -developed functions.
Hisilicon Kirin processor, always using the ARM V8 architecture. Although this version of the architecture is permanently used by ARM, it is also limited to the instruction set of its architecture. The GPU and other units in the architecture are constantly changing changes Essence
, some chip research and development companies in the United States are also constantly spending huge sums of money to buy new chips developed by ARM companies, so that other chip design manufacturers have to break through the original chip architecture.
Liveted mobile phones to fully replace Qualcomm Snapdragon processors with domestic chips, the cost is very huge at present.
The main reason is that there are many technical links in the chip field. It is controlled by relevant foreign institutions such as the United States. From all aspects of choosing the structure of the chip, the tools for designing the chip, and the supply chain of the foundry chip It is very difficult to use domestic mobile phones. The current situation of Huawei Hisilicon Kirin and the previous encounters of Xiaomi Surging S1 are enough to explain the dilemma facing domestic chips. Even if domestic chips can mass production and assemble them on domestic mobile phones, will mobile users choose to use it.
The performance will be worse, the fever will be higher, and the energy consumption will be higher, but these do not matter to me. I am in the principle of enough use.
If all mobile phones are abandoned, domestic mobile phones will rapidly develop breakthrough bottlenecks. Domestic hand -made opportunities will invest in R